In recent years, storage storage storage capacity purchase models have undergone significant evolutions: to offer customers a wider choice, in fact, the providers have introduced, as an alternative to traditional CapEx-focused purchase models, pay-as-

This allows companies that prefer not to invest in the public cloud to be given greater flexibility.

The need for greater flexibility in purchasing models has also been intensified by the trade uncertainties caused by the pandemic by Covid-19 and the resulting financial crisis.

Companies have inevitably seen themselves forced to revise their investment plans for network infrastructure and, in particular, storage. All expenditure must be carefully evaluated today more than ever: only short-term projects have been accelerated, while all the others require five-year planning.

There is therefore no doubt that customers are looking for greater agility, high flexibility and a wider room for manoeuvre when it comes to managing their storage needs. For this reason, instead of relying on a single purchase model • CapEx or • OpEx • Why not have the opportunity to use both?

It would be beneficial, in fact, to be able to decide, depending on the circumstances, the project and the workloads, whether to rely on a model CapEx or OpEx. Rather than using rigid solutions for costs and usage, why not use hybrid solutions that combine the benefits of each of these approaches?

To respond to this request, highly flexible purchase models have been introduced for storage solutions. It is now possible to buy cheap long-term capacity or rent more short-term storage space for periods of intensive use. Moreover, thanks to the model known as…Elastic pricing, it is possible to switch dynamically from one agreement to another without having to pay penalties and without having to physically move the data. This provides customers with access to all the required capacity when they need it most and eliminates the risk of taking on a long-term commitment to meet short-term storage needs.

Old and new models

Some companies that have a low capital cost still rely on traditional CapEx models, obtaining a lower overall TCO paying in advance for long-term storage. For example, companies in the energy, public services and telecommunications sectors plan their purchases in the long term carefully and depreciate resources over time. These companies have a rather structured organisation regarding purchases, especially to cope with the continuous negotiations with the providers, necessary for the traditional life cycles of the storage. Blocking the low cost of storage for scheduled activities and certain can generate savings and sustain profit margins.

These sectors, however, are an exception. In the current economic situation, most companies must focus on more targeted strategies, carefully weighing the costs of losing new opportunities compared to the actual savings resulting from long-term agreements.

Here are some scenarios where companies could benefit from having a…Elastic pricing model. DevOps test for ephemeral environments (temporary): these are projects that are born quickly and not predictable, both in terms of capacity and duration.

They could take hundreds of terabytes for weeks or months, or they could end quickly. In this case, it would be advantageous to be able to pay on CapEx basis for expected workloads as well as to create short-term storage space to cover only the period of increased capacity. Relying on efficient snapshot technology can also further simplify this scenario, regardless of the business model chosen.

Data restoration: Sometimes you need to temporarily restore an old backup, for example due to an external audit, and that recovery process requires a greater capacity than available. Paying CapEx the required capacity for temporary recovery makes little sense. The best solution is to increase it for one day, complete recovery and return later to the really needed capacity.

New app developments: development teams often start a project without having the necessary storage requirements. Lupin could become extraordinarily popular and storage needs will increase significantly. If, however, fashion goes by and the app no longer affects, the risk is to be blocked with a large amount of storage capacity paid, but unused.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You May Also Like